Nevertheless,
Peter Jackson, director of the new King
Kong, is a different story. The original
film is what inspired him to make movies
in the first place. This big ape is his
childhood hero, and making a new version
of Kong is the fulfillment of
a lifelong dream. And, after just finishing
The Lord of the Rings trilogy,
Jackson has never been more ready to accomplish
this goal, as he has earned the ability
to do anything he wants.
This
can be both good and bad. It is good because
he cares about the source material so
much that he does not want to mess it
up, and he can now do everything Willis
O'Brien wished he could do back in the
30s. He can create all the monsters he
wants, tweak the story and realize Kong
to the fullest. But the ability to do
anything can also cloud one's judgement,
thus the reason this movie ended up being
over three hours long.
Now,
I'm not saying that I think a long movie
is bad. I loved Jackson's Rings
movies, which were all at least three
hours (or longer with the Extended Edition
DVDs). But in that case, I felt that each
and every minute of those films was needed
to do the books justice. With Kong,
at least a half hour could have been cut
and the movie wouldn't have suffered one
bit. After all, the original was only
a little over an hour and a half. Depending
on the individual viewing this new version,
this might turn people away. I can already
hear people saying "A three-hour
movie about a giant ape? Huh?"
But
despite the fact that my butt was getting
numb, I actually did enjoy practically
every minute of the film, even though
some parts weren't needed. And I do feel
that most of the first act was necessary,
despite it being slow-moving. Jackson
decided to take his time with developing
the story and the characters here, as
it takes somewhere around a full hour
before we even see the hairy beast. This
is something not done very often in film
anymore, as modern audiences tend to not
have much patience. (But they have no
need to worry, since the rest of the film
consists of two more hours of monsters
and action, which is sure to wake up the
masses.)
In the first
act, we are introduced
to Ann Darrow (played by Naomi Watts from
I Heart Huckabees), the main
character of this tale, who is a struggling
stage performer in New York City trying
to make her way in the heart of the 1930s
depression. Also struggling is Carl Denham
(Jack Black from The School of Rock),
a weasel of a film director who will go
to great lengths to get his picture -
even if it means lying to everyone he
works with and risking their lives. In
this case, Denham wants to film a new
picture on an undiscovered island, but
tells everyone he's shooting in Singapore.
He also is desperate to find a leading
lady for the film, and with a stroke of
luck he runs into Ann. Telling her the
same lie, she agrees to star in his movie.
We
also have Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody
from The Pianist and The
Village), a playwright Denham hired
to write the screenplay for his film.
Denham ultimately gets Driscoll to tag
along with him on the trip, despite Driscoll's
desire not to go. While on board the ship
to "Singapore" (or in Denham's
mind - "Skull Island"), a romance
develops between Driscoll and Darrow -
a romance that gets interrupted until
the very end of the film. They never get
to really persue it, as the rest of the
crew eventually finds out they're not
really going to Singapore, and that the
place they're going to is said to host
a great beast that is separated by a great
wall around the island - a fact that not
even Carl Denham knew. There will be no
time for romance - well, at least not
between Driscoll and Darrow - since the
island is inhabited by nothing but a savage
aboriginal tribe, dinosaurs, giant creepy
crawlers, and certain death for members
of the crew. Ultimately, Ann gets kidnapped
by the tribe, where they offer her as
a sacrifice to the mighty "Kong"
- the great beast (who is probably over
25 feet tall). But what they didn't count
on was that Kong actually has a heart.
This
is where the story takes off. What I felt
the original Kong film was missing
was a connection between Kong and Darrow.
In the original, while we do get a sense
of empathy for the ape, Ann Darrow does
not. She screams the entire time, and
never really understands that Kong doesn't
mean to hurt her and that he cares for
her deeply. This time around, Darrow comes
to realize that Kong has nothing but a
genuine love for her, and ultimately she
ends up feeling the same way. I don't
think the audience would care for Darrow
by the time the film ended if she did
not side with Kong. She'd be nothing but
a nuisance, appearing no different than
all the other idiots in the film who don't
understand him. Kong is so real in this
film, conveying emotion so vividly, that
we can't help but gain total empathy for
him. We'd end up being angry at Darrow.
It was easier to still care for Ann in
the '33 version, since Kong could only
express a limited amount of emotion then.
But now, with digital technology, he is
just as real as you and I.
Kong
is rendered amazingly in this film. As
a puppet in the original, O'Brien was
extremely limited in what he could do.
Thankfully he pulled it off enough, as
we somehow gain a little empathy for the
creature in that version. But in this
new film, we can stare deeply into the
abyss of Kong's eyes and feel exactly
what he is feeling, and his movements
are exactly like an ape's. Whether he's
amused by Darrow performing stage tricks
for him, saddened by losing her, or angry
because dinos want to eat his one and
only love - we as audience members cannot
help but relate completely to Kong. The
people who created him (Weta Digital)
are the same people who did the effects
for The Lord of the Rings films.
Since they were able to render a fully
CGI character so realistically with the
character "Gollum" in those
films, the character of King Kong shows
nothing less than perfection here. And
to top it all off, Andy Serkis once again
provides his movements and acting to the
character, just as he did with Gollum,
which is sure to please the fans.
The
second act is chock full of visually appealing
chase scenes involving dinosaurs and other
creatures varying from extremely brutish
to hideously creepy. Peter Jackson has
decided to include a sequence where the
people searching for Ann are hunted by
giant insects - a scene which was in the
original film, but ended up getting cut
and ultimately lost, save for a few photo
stills. This scene is here simply to please
the fans of the original, since most every
fan wants "the lost spider pit sequence"
to be found and put back in someday. And
what a scary sequence it is!
This
film has references to the original everywhere.
For instance, the opening titles have
the same backdrop as the original, except
it's in color. Also, when Denham is trying
to find an actress, he asks if they can
get "Fay," which is an homage
to "Fay Wray" - the original
actress who played Ann Darrow in the 1933
version. Of course, they throw in that
"Cooper," the real life director
of the original, has already booked her
for another film with "R.K.O. Pictures"
- which was the studio that distributed
the original Kong. Other things
are sure to make fans giddy, like bits
of dialogue from the original film being
spoofed, the fake aboriginal tribes on
stage in New York looking and acting like
the actual aboriginies from the 1933 version,
or Peter Jackson playing a gunner on board
an airplane (just like Cooper did in his
film).
The
movie does have its unbelievable moments.
For instance, when Ann Darrow gets held
by Kong in his hand, he moves his arm back
and forth so fast that she should've gotten
whiplash. She's perfectly preserved the
whole time. Or, there's a time when Kong
and Darrow end up on a big patch of ice
in New York City that never cracks once
while Kong sits on it. There are things
like this all throughout the film that don't
quite work, with an occasional spotty special
effect sequence or plotline left unresolved
or unexplained. For example, how did they
get Kong to New York anyway? Just like the
1933 version, they never show us how. My
dad suggested they built a raft. I guess
I can buy that, but we still should've seen
this. Perhaps it might have made a bit more
sense to include this in the film, and chop
away about ten minutes in New York or on
the island.
Despite
occasional goofs or the film's overindulgence
with itself at times (especially with
its length),
fans will definitely be able to tell that
Jackson loves the original deeply, with
all the fanboy references and a great
re-telling of the love story between Kong
and Ann Darrow. All the actors give it
their very best shot, and so does the
production team. Jackson also makes sure
to give us epic landscapes of an accurate
1930s New York City (especially when we
make it to the top of the Empire State
Building in the third act) and a creepy
Skull Island that will scare the pants
off anyone. And most of all, the monsters
kick major butt, with Kong being the master
of them all. He fights a "V-Rex"
(actually, three of them) to defend Ann,
and ends up snapping the jaw of the remaining
dino (again, just like the original film).
Kong
is definitely King, and I'm sure Peter
Jackson was giggling like a little boy
throughout the entire production of this
film. In
my opinion, this film exceeds the original
in many ways. However, it doesn't eliminate
it either. The 1933 version still holds
up quite well as a veteran of film history.
But I don't think Kong fans could
have asked for a better re-envisioning
of an old classic, as this is a true marvel
to behold.
